Both vampires and wizards have their strong points. Vampires have crazy strength and speed, along with the fact that they are “virtually indestructible”, unless you rip them to shreds or manage to drive a stake through their hearts. Alone, a vampire could probably tackle you and drive their fangs into your neck in a matter of seconds. Wizards, on the other hand, get most of their power from their wands. You name a task and they can do it with a flick of the wrist. Wizards also have the power of summoning things. For example, if they needed a stake to drive into a vampire, they could most likely just summon one from a neighboring village. Villagers have a lot of stakes.
Despite their crazy abilities, vampires and wizards also have some major weaknesses. A wizard could get a serious leg up on a vampire since vampires can’t fly, or use a flying broomstick. Vampires probably wouldn’t be able to survive too many spells cast on them either. However, if the vampire was able to knock the wizard’s wand away/eat the wand, the wizard would be completely useless and would probably get completely beat up by the vampire.
Umm I think vampires would win. But i would rather wizards, because they are cooler. like i said in my last comment: Dumbledore is so much cooler than Edward. But Vampires would win..... sigh...
ReplyDeleteHmm, maybe, possibly, you could consider an introductory/conclusion paragraph? Also, does Ms. Cernera acknowledge your sarcastic, funny tone? I like it :) Maybe you could make it longer.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I'm not sure if she'll appreciate the tone. *fingers crossed*. AAGH I should do some intros/conclusions.
ReplyDelete